Hi, it’s Nils Rognerud here.
I wanted to take a minute and introduce myself, and the question you are probably asking: “Who is Nils Rognerud?”
I’m actually a pretty normal guy, who grew up in Europe – with a college degree in Electronics Engineering from Norway. I moved to the USA a few years after college and fell in love with the stimulating energy of the many bright people in California.
I got a job early on in an engineering lab in Southern California that was designing scientific instrumentation. I also worked part-time as a consultant to an inventor “Carl” that was building “compressed air machines”. He, unfortunately, got in trouble with the law, after he sold shares in his company – and the police closed down his laboratory. I never heard from him after this.
I learned very early on that scientific progress is controlled by the professors from the traditional Physics community, and that independent inventors have a hard time being taken seriously by conventional science.
I started doing my own research in an attempt to understand the nature of Gravity. It seems to me that electrical phenomena are fairly well understood, but the nature of Gravity is not really well understood – and we still cannot create artificial gravity effects with our current understanding of nature.
My research shows how Gravity might be explained as an electrical pseudo-effect or side effect. You can find how this is so on this website.
I also enjoy researching and reading about free/alternative energy inventions. This world is overdue for a change from burning fossil fuels that pollute the world we live in.
I believe this website contains vital and important information about how to produce low-cost energy from the high-frequency electro-gravity fields around Earth (similar to Dr. Thomas Henry Moray and others) – as well as information that can be used to build Electro-Gravity devices to counteract the fields of Gravity.
However, we live in a dangerous “Game of Life” on this Earth, and there are established groups that do not want change. Only the real “tigers” survive on Earth, and even they have a hard time. I invite you to download any part of this website for safe-keeping on your computer in case something happens to this site.
Please send me a message at the contact us link if you wish to talk. I will be happy to discuss any engineering consulting projects.
Let me know,
-Nils Rognerud
San Francisco, USA
Hi
Using a 1.5 watt laser, I was able to block gravity between 2 masses. The experiment is described in Physics Essays, Dec. 2011. You might want to try with a bigger laser and find how much power is needed to levitate 1 gm of matter.
Louis
I agree with your assessment of the progress in finding new approaches to gravity, I hope you visit my online post on WordPress, natureofgravity/support, I have published these ideas before on Google Knol, but they have shut down that project. I would be happy to hear if you have any opinion on my proposed solution.
Hello Nils, great work and great site here. I came to look at your page on CO2 recapture, and it’s pretty good. Important stuff, and I salute you and Norway both for taking it seriously. My only complaint is this: when you (or Prof. Friedman) say that CO2 recapture is inexpensive at $30/ton, while reforestation costs more at $50/ton, I feel you may be missing something. No, I don’t dispute your numbers, and I agree that CO2 recapture may be an important part of a global solution. But we’re all still going to need Oxygen. Forests solve both issues, and yet the Earth is still being deforested at approximately 18 million acres per year (per http://www.facingthefuture.org/ServiceLearning/FastFactsQuickActions/Deforestation/tabid/182/Default.aspx).
So what I mean is, if we just focus on CO2 recapture, that may slow global warming, but it won’t stop it and absolutely won’t reverse it. We need more O3 in the atmosphere and O2 to breathe. Trees can handle all this far better than machines, and all they ask is that we don’t cut them down so fast.
Again, good work – you, your home country, and Prof Friedman! Very reassuring. I just think CO2 recapture alone will not be enough, and may not help very much at all if we keep losing our forests at the rate we have been.
We don’t know what gravity is! lots of theories!
We don’t know what electricity is!!!!
Just it’s effects! Has to do with electrons, whatever they are!!!(:
But what is electricity, without using circular reasoning of moving charges, magnetic fields, effects, etc…??
Just an uneducated bumpkin here…so, any reference to math, GR, or quantum theory is lost on me.
Looking for some real answers before I die..(:
Because you believe that gravity has a connection with an electrical effect, and If you are interested to read an attempt to conceptually describe the nature of both gravity and gravitation etceteras, then if you click on my name, George William Nixon in the list of authors at The General Science Journal, you can download my work on those subjects. With regards and best wishes.
You are justified in questioning the contemporary theory of gravity. I believe it will be an electrical engineer that reveals the true nature of gravity.
For your continuing education, please read the IEEE article featured on the website noted. Maxwell was correct, an earth-centric unit of measure has definitely hindered scientific progress. The SI units of measure are why we have these weird numbers attached to such universal constants of c, G, hbar, and epsilon0.
The IEEE article points out a very simple relationship that is not taught in the textbooks. It has more significance than I could state in the paper. It was difficult enough to get it published as it was.
EXPERIMENTAL QUANTUM ANTIGRAVITY :
https://quantumantigravity.wordpress.com/
Hi!
What do you think about Maxwell Sangulani Chikumbutso’s generator (Saith Group). Does it really work?
Were you the Technical Advisor for the project?
I did some testing on the machine of Maxwell. The machine worked when we saw it, at that time.
However, Max seems to have some delivery issues. I recommend waiting with purchasing this machine until he has completed his first delivery.
Introduction to Potential Difference inc. – US Patented Sub-Atomic Quantum Electron Energy Harvesting Innovations & The Law of Creation of Energy
Hello Nils,
My name is Thane Heins and I am the CEO of Potential Difference inc. (PDi), an Ottawa Canada based Clean-Tech R&D company.
I am writing to you today to inform you that our company has developed. and US patented four innovations which all have the ability to tap into and harness created Sub-Atomic Electron Energy.
Three of our innovations (ReGenX Generator, Bi-Toroid Transformer, ReGen-X Quantum Motor) have all been third party validated, internationally replicated and proven to operate at infinite efficiency (please see test data report below).
PDi’s ReGenX Generator and ReGen-X Quantum Motor innovations both perform mechanical work, but they require zero external energy input when doing so.
The energy source for both the ReGenX Generator and ReGen-X Quantum Motor is created Sub-Atomic Electron Electromagnetic Field Energy.
This energy is created when charged particles (electrons) cascade down in a current bearing wire.
In all conventional electric generators this created Electromagnetic Field Energy performs Negative Work and it reduces the Kinetic Energy of the Generator/Prime Mover system and is explained in a law of physics called Lenz’s Law (which is part of the law of Conservation of Energy).
In the ReGenX Generator and ReGen-X Quantum Motor innovations this very same created Electromagnetic Field Energy is delayed in the Time Domain such that it performs Positive Work increasing the Kinetic Energy of the Generator/Prime Mover system and operating at infinite efficiency.
The ReGenX Generator allows electricity to be generated with zero external mechanical input power requirements and the ReGen-X Quantum Motor allows Electro-Mechanical Work to be performed with zero external electrical input power.
Our innovations are governed by two new laws of physics called Heins’ Law and the Law of Creation of Energy.
With kind regards
Thane
Thane C. Heins
CEO Potential +/- Difference Inc.
[email protected]
1.613.898.1131
Potential +/- Difference Inc. – Pioneering Electric Vehicle Regenerative Acceleration Technology & Charging Ahead…
“We generate solutions”
History of US Patented ReGenX Generator / PDi Innovations 2005 – 2020
https://www.slideshare.net/PDiCEOThaneHeins3240/history-of-pdi-innovations-2005-2020
Potential Difference inc. Innovations Test Program with 13 International Validation Replications
https://www.slideshare.net/ThaneNEWENERGYBLUEPR/final-potential-difference-innovations-test-program-with-international-replications-250312895
The Nature of Sub-Atomic Quantum Photon Energy Creation and Externalization Around a Current Carrying Conductor https://www.slideshare.net/ThaneNEWENERGYBLUEPR/the-nature-of-subatomic-quantum-photon-energy-creation-and-externalization-around-a-current-carrying-conductor
Patents by Inventor Thane C. Heins
https://patents.justia.com/inventor/thane-c-heins
“Every great advance in science has issued from a new audacity of imagination.”
~ John Dewey
Your introduction is very appreciated. It is extremely rare to meet people holding similar interests and having the same level of reaction to the opinion of scientific academia conditioning.
To justify this communication, I have to introduce myself. I’m an author. It’s kind of like a teacher that learns by explaining things. I’m an author who studies and finds things which leads to asking more questions.
When I was a child I was fascinated with magnets. In high school I asked how they work. In college I discovered that the answers were declarations of words that proved no one knew the answer. It took 15 years of my own research and study to find the answer: molecular combinations of electron structure. This is to say the best element combinations for magnets have 17 electrons in their outer shell. BTW, this info is still not found on an internet search and I found this answer in the early 1980s.
My years of having several different careers and continuing interest in theoretical physics has led me into sustainable urban growth and advanced transit technology. Recently published a book about this.
The purpose of me sending this to your site ia for conversation. I’m working on a new book which is specifically to encourage research for sustainable transportation. Both books make the point that automobiles are not sustainable. The motors of electric cars are more efficient than gasoline but, they are still cars. I found your website and am full support with great respect for everything you’re doing to promote the science of electrogravitics.
The new book I’m writing proposes a new theory for the path of particle motion. It’s similar to the string theory. It’s actually an unpublished theory that I discovered in the 1970s as a physics student. During the process of digging it up to write about it a couple years ago, i found a significant change was necessary. I believe this path is legitimate and relevant to satisfy a valid explanation for gravity.
This is more of an email than a comment. I live in Central CA and would love to meet for coffee sometime to have a nice conversation about gravity. A few years ago I worked doing construction work on the Peninsula and always enjoy having an excuse to go to the Bay Area.
Hi Nils,
this is Stefan Hartmann, the admin from overunity.com
I saw the Thrive 2 movie and am now interested what kind of tests did you do on the
Maxwell unit with the welder load.
what exact tests did you conduct and how much energy have you drawn from the device
and what batteries where in this device…?
How many KWh of energy did you draw in these tests ?
What kind of RF energy is he claiming is recharging his batteries ?
Are these some kind of RF pulses he is feeing onto his batteries ?
Or are these some kind of Bedini style pulsers, that recharge the batteries ?
Many thanks.
Please respond via email or over here in this page.
Regards, Stefan.
Dear Nils,
Quantum mechanics is a concrete result of the General Theory of
Relativity. According to the General Theory of Relativity, a clock on
Jupiter lags behind a clock on Earth. A clock on earth lags behind a
clock on the moon. they ended the theory here. However, I continue the
theory with the result I deduced from the Time Flow Formula. One hour
on the moon lags behind a clock on the alpha ray. A clock in the Alpha
beam lags behind a clock in the Beta beam. a clock in beta ray lags
behind a clock in x ray. Concrete results of the General Theory of
Relativity begin to be seen as masses and energies get smaller. These
are the same theory. Large masses have a very long life. Small masses
have very short lifetimes. As the lifetimes get shorter,
transformations from mass to energy and from energy to mass begin. In
summary Quantum mechanics is a concrete result of the General Theory
of Relativity.
This is a result from the Timeflow Formula. (Timeflow=Time/Energy).
Every simple physics formula explains a law of nature. In the Timeflow
Formula; It tells that a time equal to the amount of energy will be
released in a physical process. You can find more information on my
website. (timeflow.org).
In addition,The flow of the thought energy intensity in our brain is
body pain, unhappiness and boredom, joy, happiness and love,
sleep, and finally death, respectively, from high energy to low
energy. At the moment
to sleep, if we had a good sleep, our thought energy is very close to
zero or zero. When the energy flow intensity increases in our brain,
according to the ‘Timeflow Formula (Timeflow=Time/Energy). The
timeflow will slow down. As the energy density (power) decreases, the
timeflow will accelerate. In the case of sleep and death, the timeflow
will be infinite. The timeflow formula explains very clearly and
simply that this situation, which is perceived as psychological time
is actually a purely physical event. I think it would be very useful
for psychology experts to evaluate the ‘Timeflow’ Formula and the
philosophical interpretation of the formula.