On the ElectroMagnetic Nature of Gravity

Note:  This page should only be read after understanding the basic concepts of a unique induced electrical field, with similar properties to that of Gravity.

The “short version” for explaining Gravity:  The force we know as Gravity can be described as a pseudo-force, produced by a non-shieldable divergent Laplace Force, which is produced by the relativistic motions of orbital electrons of all ordinary matter. 

UPDATE (Dec 2017):  Please watch the new video with demonstrations to explain the force of Gravity as an ElectroMagnetic side-effect.


Electrogravity Axiom #1:


Electro-gravity fields are produced by moving negative or positive charges, either by moving charged particles or by moving charged objects.  This definition applies to moving atomic charges in nature, as well as man-made mechanical inventions that move charged objects.  The effects are usually much smaller than forces from normal electrostatic and magnetic fields.

There is really nothing new about the EG field.  It is just a new name for the field that causes the old deflective force on a charged particle moving through a magnetic field or the force from the relative motion between a magnetic field and a charged particle.  For illustration, the figure to the left does not show magnetic or electrostatic fields, only EG fields.

However, it is only fairly recently that the properties of this force have been investigated and found to have unique properties, similar to that of gravity.  This being mainly that the field is non-shieldable.


Electrogravity Axiom #2: 

Electrogravity field for axiom #2

Electrogravity field for axiom #2

Normal matter produces electro-gravity fields due to the moving negative charges from orbital electrons.  This is so even when the magnetic fields from a group of randomly oriented atoms average to zero.  The electrogravitic fields produced by randomly oriented atoms do not cancel each other out but are always additive.

EG fields are produced by all electrically neutral matter (antimatter is not discussed here) and are always directed away from the atom.  This means that negatively charged particles will experience an attractive force towards the non-charged atom and positively charged particles will be pushed away from the EG producing atom(s).  The force can exist even when the resulting magnetic fields are equal to zero.  It is worth noting that this force is many orders of magnitude smaller than other forces at work in the atom(s).



Electrogravity Axiom #3: 

Electrogravity field for Axiom #3:

Electrogravity field for Axiom #3:

Electrically neutral atoms will not experience a force effect in a non-diverging electrogravity field.

Ordinary (non-ionized) atoms will not experience a force effect in an EG field that is non-diverging.   This is due to the equal push and pulls from the positive and negative charge of the atoms.

A small charge separation might take place in the test atom – in this type of electrogravity field, but since the atom is submerged in a non-divergent EG field the force will be equal on both the positive and negative charge center.


Electrogravity Axiom #4:

The force that we know as gravity is simply a pseudo-force, produced by the special non-shieldable dielectric effect which is produced by the relativistic motions of orbital electrons of ordinary matter.

If the EG field is divergent, then normal (non-ionized) atoms, found in all matter, will experience a non-shieldable force effect due to the minute charge separation that will occur and the resulting “dielectric” force effect producing a non-equal push-pull effect on the separated charges.

Please note this special “dielectric effect” is not the same as the normal dielectric effect experienced with materials that are located between two electric potentials.



This “dielectric effect” from EG fields is unique in that it applies to metals and all matter alike, as well as ordinary dielectric materials.  This effect is due to the non-shieldable nature of the EG field.  Planet  Earth has a large EG field due to the many atoms on the planet itself.

Preliminary calculations  – based on the measured weight of hydrogen atoms at the surface of the Earth – estimate this EG-field to be 12500 Volt/meter.  This field produces a polarization of the atmosphere and tends to draw negatively charged particles down to the surface.  It may explain Earth lightning  – as well as lightning sprites (which strike out from the top of the atmosphere), which is not yet fully understood.

It is important to remember, that a constant magnitude EG fields – which is non-shieldable – cannot be measured directly, as a voltage potential between two points in space, with either current based or electrostatic type voltmeters.  This may explain the elusive property of the electrogravity field – other than the normal force on a “falling apple”.

The author believes there are ways with ordinary electromagnetics to unpolarize the atoms in an EG fields and render the unique EG-dielectric force ineffective and produce an object without weight – although it will of course still have mass.  See more on the how to generate artificial gravity and read the author’s comments on the mysterious Tampere experiment.

16 comments to On the ElectroMagnetic Nature of Gravity

  • in my website You can read the experimental prove that gravity is an electromagnetic force. I show this with experiments in isotachophoresis described in part 1 and 3 of the website. In part 2 of the website a give an other experiment that confirms my findings in isotachophoresis. The basis of gravity is an induction mechanism in the nucleus of the atoms each time that a proton is transformed into a neutron and vice versa by the exchange of a pion. This magnetic field created by induction in the nucleus of the atom is a new property for atoms and this can explain gravity. You can demonstrate this by isotachophoresis experiments

  • Well, at least I can read this print!

    But, without circular reasoning, what are “charges”?!

    They are used to explain an assortment of phenomenon, but there is no real explanation of what they are. Just the arbitrary assignment of a charge and the effects it produces. What is The nuts and bolts that produce “charge”?


  • Shane

    Wilbert B. Smith claimed that moving a magnetic field will create a perpendicular motional electric field. Moving the resultant MEF parallel to its field direction would produce a tempic (gravitational) field. This is consistent with devices like the Searl levity disc and David Hamel’s discs, among others. What do you think?

  • Dear Sir,

    You will ever experience and supprted by mathematical evidence,that gravity is of ordinary electro magnetic nature.

    With kinds regards,

    Dirk Cornelis Krispijn

    The Netherlands.

  • rajesh kumar nayak

    you should make things more clear

  • dirk cornelis krispijn


    Op deze foto ziet u Dirk Krispijn aan het stenen bikken van de in restauratie zijnde Dorpskerk. Hij was een vakman op dit gebied. Hij was een oude vrijgezel die, …


    I don’t even take the opportunity to re-act on this nonsense..

    Another “tip” from the real “Dirk Krispijn”:

    The nature of “Physical Science” is based on the “tripple temperature” of hygrogen.

    With kind regards

    Dirk Krispijn

  • Bengt Nyman

    I agree, but I wouldn’t call it a pseudo-force, it is real and quantifiable:

    • A pseudo-force is always real and quantifiable. It is only means the force is not a fundamental force and has a different cause, due to having the wrong coordinate system. Read more from Prof. Richard Feynman here:
      12–5 Pseudo forces

      • Bengt Nyman

        Gravity is caused by Net Coulomb Dipole attraction. There is no longer any doubt. See http://www.dipole.se. Also see Thomas Townsend Brown mega capacitor dipole experiment 1920.
        Coulomb forces are clearly not pseudo-forces.

        • Can you explain for the audience how the Net Coulomb Dipole attraction is not shielded by a simple metal sheet or box?

          • Bengt Nyman

            Because of the particle spins involved, gravity is electromagnetic in nature and is in that respect similar to magnetism forming dipole chains through intermediate materials rather than being shielded.
            “Gravity is no more complicated or mystical than magnetism.
            We have been sold the wrong idea about gravity for 113 years.
            Gravity and magnetism are similar in many ways.
            Gravity is caused by orbital offsets and works on all materials, regardless of electron orbital planarity.
            Magnetism is caused by orbital planes being parallell and works only on materials where orbital planes are free to angulate to become parallell, temporarily or permanently.”

          • I am asking about your model of Net Coulomb Dipole attraction i.e. electrostatic forces not magnetic. These forces should be easily shieldable with a metal sheet, right?
            -Nils Rognerud

          • Bengt Nyman

            Purely static, electrostatic forces are shieldable. However, because of the electron spin there is also an electromagnetic effect which is not so easily shielded. Gravity is communicated by a combination of the two, and forms links of electrostatic dipoles and electromagnetic dipoles perpendicular to and spinning around the axes of the electrostatic dipoles.

          • Your comment says “not so easily shielded”? – Perhaps you have heard of government SCIF rooms for secure private meetings? These rooms are heavily electromagnetically shielded.
            Have you heard any reports of people losing weight when attending a meeting in electromagnetically shielded rooms? I would really be interested to see that…
            Here are some photos of such electromagnetic shielding used in SCIF rooms:

          • Bengt Nyman

            Back to the subject please, Nils. How are your capacitor experiments ala T.T. Brown going ?

          • Bengt,
            The subject is your claim that Gravity is electromagnetic. You said that “…there is also an electromagnetic effect which is not so easily shielded.”

            Does this mean that people walking into a shielded room (for example a Faraday cage) should feel lighter? Yes or no?…

            T. Brown experiments: I am still reading and setting up the T. Brown capacitor experiments. I will be reporting on this website as soon as I have the results.


Leave a Reply to Dirk Cornelis Krispijn Cancel reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>